bbs.spamgourmet.com

Posted: **Wed Sep 29, 2004 6:41 am**

Posted: **Wed Sep 29, 2004 5:13 pm**

sure, but please note:

1) spammers don't do that -- we've seen a couple of *messages* sent that way in 4 years, but that's it
2) you can deal with that by using watchwords (preferred) or
3) you can deal with that by using a prefix

I personally don't think spamgourmet is big enough to worry about a meaningful focused circumvention effort by spammers in any event, but the presence of prefix and watchword functionality (even without knowing how much it's actually used) would tend to further reduce the speculative value of any such effort from the perspective of a spammer

Posted: **Thu Sep 30, 2004 2:18 am**

Not to mention that it would not go very far. If you try to mailbomb an sg user, other protections come into play, such as the limit on the number of messages per hour.

bbs.spamgourmet.com

question

question