"Rejected logging" - thought this was fixed??

General discussion re sg.

"Rejected logging" - thought this was fixed??

Postby sg-since03 » Mon Mar 02, 2009 11:47 pm

(Apologies for starting a new thread; wasn't sure if you'd see a post in a thread whose last entry is dated Mar 31, 2008. [http://bbs.spamgourmet.com/viewtopic.php?t=1081 Suggestion: "Don't log for hidden" OR rejected [@]])

Syskoll, rejected addresses are showing up in my "eaten message log" again, despite watchwords and your fix implemented in the above-referenced thread. Details:

"2009-03-01 05:17 theodorad@droppatrol.de g"

'G' is unlinked, never created, but I still don't want it/that type of mischief-address clogging the eaten message log. Perhaps the logging behavior reverted as an unintended by-product of a recent fix?

PS Unless the address above belongs to an innocent user who's been spoofed or hijacked, I see no reason to obfuscate a spammer's address. Let them eat spam!
sg-since03
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 9:11 am

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron