Reply function

[Guest]

Two remarks/questions about the reply-function:

- Should it work with hotmail accounts? because hotmail always add the following line to the email. Is that line being removed?
X-Originating-Email: [username@hotmail.com]

- Is it possible to keep the orginal Name of the Sender i.e.

My Name <realaddresss@isp.com> replies to replycode@spamgourmet.com and that all converts to

From: My Name <code@spamgourmet.com>

PS Why do all domains used have something with spam in the domainname? Wouldn't abcd.com be less abvious?

[josh]

we hit the standard headers and we've added some x-headers. I don't know if we hit that one.

we can look at preserving the name -- I know we're not doing it now.

there's a bunch of domains that don't have spam in them, no? dfgh.net xoxy.net recursor.net neverbox.com etc.?

[Guest]

we can look at preserving the name -- I know we're not doing it now.

That would really make you (free) service even better then it's already; and better then the most paid !!! services....

It would be even greater if it would be optional. By concept it could maybe work like:

- extract the name from the sender; add it to the (re-written) From line (simple and effective)

or

- allow users to define the From Name (less flexible, more db-space, and not so good for privacy reasons according to your own FAQ.)

Just my .02