Suspicious/odd "Mail delivery failed: returning message

Use this forum to get help.

Suspicious/odd "Mail delivery failed: returning message

Postby davidq » Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:49 am

I've now received three of these messages, each from a different one of my Spamgourmet (SG) addresses. In each case the message was identical, save for the SG address. Each was apparently addressed to support@ups.com. Here's what seems significant from a message: (With ... in place of my SG ID.)

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

support@ups.com
SMTP error from remote mail server after end of data:
host email-vip.ups.com [153.2.242.49]: 554 Transaction Failed. Spam Message, not delivered.

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------

Return-path: "Mail Delivery System - Mailer-Daemon@spamgourmet.com" <+nlp+...+8b337d7aec.Mailer-Daemon#spamgourmet.com@spamgourmet.com>
Received: from spamgourmet by gourmet7.spamgourmet.com with local (Exim 4.63)
(envelope-from <nlp.p....@xoxy.net>)
id 1NaDVw-0003DN-KN
for support@ups.com; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:25:20 +0000
Received: from Debian-exim by gourmet7.spamgourmet.com with local (Exim 4.63)
id 1NaDVw-0003DH-Ei
for ; Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:25:20 +0000
X-Failed-Recipients: nlp.p....@xoxy.net
Auto-Submitted: auto-replied
From: nlp.p....@xoxy.net
To: support@ups.com
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Message-Id: <E1NaDVw-0003DH-Ei@gourmet7.spamgourmet.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:25:20 +0000
X-Spamgourmet:

Any thoughts on what's going on?
--David
davidq
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 10:43 pm

Postby jgombos » Tue Mar 09, 2010 7:35 pm

I seem to have the same issue, and it's costing me money.

When an email from Ameritrade bounces, Ameritrade prints and snail-mails the client instead (claiming that it's legally compulsory for them to do so), and they charge $2 every time it happens.

OTOH, Ameritrade has proven that they cannot be trusted with any non-disposable address, because they leak their addresses to spammers.
jgombos
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2005 3:28 am

Postby lwc » Wed Mar 10, 2010 12:10 am

jgombos wrote:OTOH, Ameritrade has proven that they cannot be trusted with any non-disposable address, because they leak their addresses to spammers.

As a tempoary tip, I guess you can set up a Gmail account with 2 filters:
1) Forward messages based on X (from address, subject, etc.) into your real address (assuming you trust Gmail better...).
2) Delete everything (does it work on the messages from 1?)
lwc
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 9:09 am


Return to Support / Hilfe / ayuda / ondersteuning / ...

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests