mail doesn't seem to be forwarded right now

Use this forum to get help.

Postby SysKoll » Wed Nov 28, 2007 12:42 pm

I would have liked to see the complete error message including headers. Do you know which ISP the sender of the delayed messages was using?
-- SysKoll
SysKoll
 
Posts: 893
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 9:24 pm

Postby lwc » Wed Nov 28, 2007 1:18 pm

It's a work place and I can't start asking the exclusive sender to check headers. They just forwarded me the error message. I bet it's just a customized version of the "can't deliver for 4 hours, will try for 5 days".

There's also a site that sends me automated messages from a no-reply address. Some days I got an automated message telling me I can't e-mail the no-reply address. This must mean Spamgourmet alerted the no-reply address for a delay or something.
lwc
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 9:09 am

me too...

Postby user7 » Thu Nov 29, 2007 7:57 pm

Hi guys, I have similar problems.

1) A daily newsletter thru xoxy.net was hung up inside SG from 28 Nov 2007 23:41:07 GMT to 29 Nov 2007 19:39:12 GMT. I will PM the headers to Josh shortly.

2) Email to a new address @mamber.net you show created (thus sent) yesterday a.m. has not arrived.

Others problems may exist and are unknown.

Thanks for all the great work you do!
user7
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 6:25 pm

Re: me too...

Postby user7 » Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:21 pm

I wrote:2) Email to a new address @mamber.net you show created (thus sent) yesterday a.m. has not arrived.

Update:
That finally arrived after being stuck @ SG for 2 days, as you can see:
Code: Select all
Received: from gourmet.spamgourmet.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
   by gourmet.spamgourmet.com (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id lAU7cYoa022848
   for <me>; Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:41:19 GMT
Received: (from jqh1@localhost)
   by gourmet.spamgourmet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id lASGeLvu016580
   for me; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:40:22 GMT
user7
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 6:25 pm

Postby warrenn » Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:45 pm

I'm also not getting emails coming through. And I'm having timeout issues getting to the main page (spamgourmet.com, xoxy.net). Oddly enough, these BBS pages seem to load okay.

When I try to send mail, I get this error:

Code: Select all
 ls | mail -v testemail.t.fakeuser@xoxy.net
testemail.t.fakeuser@xoxy.net... Connecting to gourmet.spamgourmet.com. via esmtp...
testemail.t.fakeuser@xoxy.net... Deferred: Connection refused by gourmet.spamgourmet.com.


Sending to spamgourmet.com I get this:

Code: Select all
ls | mail -v testemail.t.fakeuser@spamgourmet.com
testemail.t.fakeuser@spamgourmet.com... Connecting to gourmet.spamgourmet.com. via esmtp...
testemail.t.fakeuser@spamgourmet.com... Connecting to gourmet7.spamgourmet.com. via esmtp...
testemail.t.fakeuser@spamgourmet.com... Deferred: Connection refused by gourmet7.spamgourmet.com.
warrenn
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 12:58 am

Postby warrenn » Fri Nov 30, 2007 8:57 pm

Here's a traceroute from me to spamgourmet in case that helps:

Code: Select all
trying to get source for spamgourmet.com
source should be 9.53.88.32
traceroute to spamgourmet.com (216.75.35.134) from 9.53.88.32 (9.53.88.32), 30 hops max
outgoing MTU = 1500
 1  aus-ud-5b-v388 (9.53.88.4)  2 ms  1 ms  1 ms
 2  aus-co-a-v821 (9.41.2.85)  1 ms  1 ms  1 ms
 3  aus-bd-a-ge4 (9.41.2.2)  1 ms  1 ms  1 ms
 4  aus-sc-a-v256 (9.41.1.6)  1 ms  1 ms  1 ms
 5  aus-p9-a (9.41.4.6)  2 ms  2 ms  2 ms
 6  9.64.34.118 (9.64.34.118)  7 ms  7 ms  7 ms
 7  CO004-R01-12406-POS1-0-101.wan.ibm.com (9.64.3.65)  30 ms  30 ms  30 ms
 8  9.17.4.44 (9.17.4.44)  30 ms  29 ms  30 ms
 9  bld-id-a-v279.boulder.ibm.com (9.17.216.11)  29 ms  29 ms  28 ms
10  32.97.110.4 (32.97.110.4)  30 ms  29 ms  31 ms
11  10.15.255.17 (10.15.255.17)  30 ms  30 ms  30 ms
12  10.15.255.33 (10.15.255.33)  32 ms  30 ms  30 ms
13  dvr-edge-10.inet.qwest.net (65.121.40.217)  32 ms  32 ms  30 ms
14  dvr-core-02.inet.qwest.net (205.171.10.141)  37 ms  32 ms  33 ms
15  dal-core-01.inet.qwest.net (67.14.2.49)  61 ms  55 ms  57 ms
16  dap-brdr-02.inet.qwest.net (205.171.225.1)  54 ms  55 ms  55 ms
17  gi1-20.mpd01.dfw03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.11.69)  346 ms  210 ms  290 ms
18  te9-1.mpd01.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.173)  71 ms  253 ms  231 ms
19  gi4-0-0.core01.dfw01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.2.93)  64 ms  64 ms  64 ms
20  po13-0.core01.iah01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.98)  77 ms  70 ms  69 ms
21  po14-0.core01.sat01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.194)  76 ms  75 ms  75 ms
22  po14-0.core01.phx02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.7.85)  92 ms  90 ms  90 ms
23  po14-0.core01.san01.atlas.cogentco.com (66.28.4.6)  98 ms  100 ms  99 ms
24  vl3812.na21.b006463-1.san01.atlas.cogentco.com (38.20.33.130)  101 ms  100 ms  101 ms
25  ge1-2.gw65-02.kmc01.sdcix.net (66.28.28.126)  288 ms  137 ms  231 ms
26  * * *
27  * mail.minusone.net (216.75.35.134)  102 ms  103 ms
28  * mail.minusone.net (216.75.35.134)  102 ms *
29  * mail.minusone.net (216.75.35.134)  103 ms *
30  mail.minusone.net (216.75.35.134)  102 ms  108 ms *
warrenn
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 12:58 am

Postby lwc » Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:27 pm

It doesn't help. The problem is not between Spamgourmet and you but your sender and Spamgourmet.

Anyway, during yesterday and today I kept not getting messages, while other messages did arrive (details in PM).
lwc
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 9:09 am

Postby lwc » Wed Dec 05, 2007 1:23 pm

I don't get messages today either.
lwc
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 9:09 am

Postby SysKoll » Fri Dec 07, 2007 1:48 pm

Warren,

We don't filter IBM, so these results are strange.
-- SysKoll
SysKoll
 
Posts: 893
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 9:24 pm

Postby thehimalayas » Wed Dec 12, 2007 3:59 pm

lwc wrote:I don't get messages today either.


I am having the same issue, where email is not getting delivered on time to my gmail address. Sometimes it's a delay of a few hours. Other times, it is a delay of days.

Here is a transcript of how long it took for the BBS welcome email to get to me (50 minutes):

Received: by 10.35.119.13 with SMTP id w13cs93984pym;
Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:56:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.111.1 with SMTP id j1mr421849wac.138.1197446199350;
Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:56:39 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <jqh1@gourmet.spamgourmet.com>
Received: from gourmet.spamgourmet.com (gourmet.spamgourmet.com [216.75.35.164])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m25si7902639waf.2007.12.11.23.56.38;
Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:56:39 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of jqh1@gourmet.spamgourmet.com designates 216.75.35.164 as permitted sender) client-ip=216.75.35.164;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of jqh1@gourmet.spamgourmet.com designates 216.75.35.164 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jqh1@gourmet.spamgourmet.com
Received: from gourmet.spamgourmet.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by gourmet.spamgourmet.com (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id lBC7ubXZ031775
for <xxxxXXXXxxxx@gmail.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 07:56:37 GMT
Received: (from jqh1@localhost)
by gourmet.spamgourmet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id lBC7uaNh031743
for xxxxXXXXxxxx@gmail.com; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 07:56:36 GMT
Received: from smtpout17-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout17-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [68.178.232.13])
by gourmet.spamgourmet.com (8.13.8/8.13.7) with SMTP id lBC7uYbQ031680
for <bbssg.XXX@spamgourmet.net>; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 07:56:34 GMT
Received: (qmail 20862 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2007 07:06:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO linhost222.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) ([64.202.163.11])
(envelope-sender <antichef@linhost222.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net>)
by smtpout17-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <bbssg.XXX@spamgourmet.net>; 12 Dec 2007 07:06:42 -0000
Received: from linhost222.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by linhost222.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id lBC76gZB021741
for <bbssg.XXX@spamgourmet.net>; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:06:42 -0700
Received: (from antichef@localhost)
by linhost222.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id lBC76gs8021739;
Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:06:42 -0700


This one came relatively quickly. Most others have delays of 5 hours or more.
thehimalayas
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 7:06 am

Postby thehimalayas » Wed Dec 12, 2007 5:55 pm

Just so there is no confusion, I have obscured the real email addresses with a series of "xxx".


thehimalayas wrote:
lwc wrote:I don't get messages today either.


I am having the same issue, where email is not getting delivered on time to my gmail address. Sometimes it's a delay of a few hours. Other times, it is a delay of days.

Here is a transcript of how long it took for the BBS welcome email to get to me (50 minutes):

Received: by 10.35.119.13 with SMTP id w13cs93984pym;
Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:56:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.111.1 with SMTP id j1mr421849wac.138.1197446199350;
Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:56:39 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <jqh1@gourmet.spamgourmet.com>
Received: from gourmet.spamgourmet.com (gourmet.spamgourmet.com [216.75.35.164])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m25si7902639waf.2007.12.11.23.56.38;
Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:56:39 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of jqh1@gourmet.spamgourmet.com designates 216.75.35.164 as permitted sender) client-ip=216.75.35.164;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of jqh1@gourmet.spamgourmet.com designates 216.75.35.164 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jqh1@gourmet.spamgourmet.com
Received: from gourmet.spamgourmet.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by gourmet.spamgourmet.com (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id lBC7ubXZ031775
for <xxxxXXXXxxxx@gmail.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 07:56:37 GMT
Received: (from jqh1@localhost)
by gourmet.spamgourmet.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id lBC7uaNh031743
for xxxxXXXXxxxx@gmail.com; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 07:56:36 GMT
Received: from smtpout17-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout17-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [68.178.232.13])
by gourmet.spamgourmet.com (8.13.8/8.13.7) with SMTP id lBC7uYbQ031680
for <bbssg.XXX@spamgourmet.net>; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 07:56:34 GMT
Received: (qmail 20862 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2007 07:06:42 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO linhost222.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) ([64.202.163.11])
(envelope-sender <antichef@linhost222.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net>)
by smtpout17-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <bbssg.XXX@spamgourmet.net>; 12 Dec 2007 07:06:42 -0000
Received: from linhost222.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by linhost222.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id lBC76gZB021741
for <bbssg.XXX@spamgourmet.net>; Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:06:42 -0700
Received: (from antichef@localhost)
by linhost222.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id lBC76gs8021739;
Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:06:42 -0700


This one came relatively quickly. Most others have delays of 5 hours or more.
thehimalayas
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 7:06 am

Postby user7 » Thu Dec 13, 2007 2:12 am

yes, something is stuck at SG. Here's a notice of the last post FROM SG to me. Quoting the delay from the header:

Code: Select all
Received: from smtpout20-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout20-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [68.178.232.19])
   by gourmet.spamgourmet.com (8.13.8/8.13.7) with SMTP id lBD1sOFA029607
   for <user7.xxx@spamgourmet.com>; Thu, 13 Dec 2007 01:54:24 GMT
Received: (qmail 22707 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2007 15:59:03 -0000
...
Message-ID: <0b7003a52af29713f10b454d697df28e@bbs.spamgourmet.com>


That's a 10 hour delay. :cry:

However, for Most of my needs, it's ok. Happy Holidays to Josh & the great folks @ SG!
user7
 
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 6:25 pm

Postby SysKoll » Thu Dec 13, 2007 2:27 am

Sigh... Sorry about that, folks. We are obviously bombarded. The machine is very busy. I'll try to see if there is room for improvement.

Please be aware that we are users of sg and that we don't get special treatment. When there is a slowdow, it affects us as well. So that's more incentive.
-- SysKoll
SysKoll
 
Posts: 893
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2003 9:24 pm

Postby lwc » Fri Dec 14, 2007 12:40 am

Guess what, I've just (December 14th) got a message from December 3th and December 9th. All of the received lines are from today, but the date header mentions those dates (the content also reflects those dates).
lwc
 
Posts: 455
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 9:09 am

Postby thehimalayas » Fri Dec 14, 2007 12:58 am

lwc wrote:Guess what, I've just (December 14th) got a message from December 3th and December 9th. All of the received lines are from today, but the date header mentions those dates (the content also reflects those dates).


Well, two days back (Dec 12) I got a message dated Nov 27 :-)
thehimalayas
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 7:06 am

PreviousNext

Return to Support / Hilfe / ayuda / ondersteuning / ...

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests

cron