Page 2 of 2

I disagree

PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2005 3:33 pm
by cray
Mercury wrote:sorry, but it makes no sense to me: if you have time to send mail to sg, you also have time to visit sg's webpage to change whatever you want. there's no advantage.


I am logged into my email all day and it is easy to send a quick message. I picture doing this when I receive an email that spamgourmet has so kindly identified as my last one.

Because of the wonderful setup at spamgourmet, I rarely have to actually login to the site. It would take much more time to navigate to the spamgourmet website, login, find the email address, click the url to edit it, make the change and click save.

I think this would be a time saver. Only issue would be remembering all the commands.

PostPosted: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:08 am
by Guest
I agree with many of the suggestions above. I vote as follows:

    Different password for email resets

    Multiple commands per email

    Global enable/disable for the whole system [set at SG website only]

    Individual enable/disable for email control of each subsidiary function, e.g., enable/disable email control of individual disposable email controls [set at SG website only]

    Individual enable/disable of email control of each existing disposable

    Enable/disable email control of new, automatically created disposables [created by first use]