No, I don't think so.
I assume you mean my SG email address (I have watchwords enabled, so their email would have bounced). Also, I initialized the email ID with no number, so it got the default of 5. When I got back to SG to check why I wasn't receiving messages, I was that the remaining message count for all 3 IDs was 0.
Let us say my email ID was
abc.vsp@spamgourmet.com (It wasn't, but I am using that as an example). A portion of the real headers from that message look as follows (except for my SG email ID for that list).
Hope this info helps
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165])
by gourmet.spamgourmet.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0B0jlc4020016
for <abc.vsp@spamgourmet.com>; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:45:47 -0800
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1CoA2w-0006q3-BN
for
abc.vsp@spamgourmet.com; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:38:06 -0500
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
id 1Co9sd-0005xp-Q7
for
gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:27:29 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
id 1Co9sP-0005r7-Kn
for
gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:27:14 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Co9sP-0005mv-3Z
for
gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:27:13 -0500
Received: from [205.149.2.136] (helo=xl2.seyza.com)
by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
(Exim 4.34) id 1Co9Zj-0001sj-HB
for
gnu-arch-users@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 19:07:56 -0500