Suggestion: "Don't log for hidden" OR rejected [@]
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 5:28 pm
As mentioned in another thread - spammers are creating sg addresses on their own, either by slightly altering user-created addresses, or creating entirely new ones. (Using user name + entirely new word.)
So OK, that got old, & I'm now using watchwords. And OK, it was fun for a while seeing spammers' creations DOA in the "Last 3 eaten message(s)" log, especially since they are unlinked. (DOA, after all.)
But now that's old too. I don't want to even see these _attempts_. Please make the "don't log for hidden addresses" option exclude those addresses from the list as well. Thanks.
Addendum: that list is useful for occasionally catching and following up on email that shouldn't have been deleted. Logging those phony addresses interferes with that function.
So OK, that got old, & I'm now using watchwords. And OK, it was fun for a while seeing spammers' creations DOA in the "Last 3 eaten message(s)" log, especially since they are unlinked. (DOA, after all.)
But now that's old too. I don't want to even see these _attempts_. Please make the "don't log for hidden addresses" option exclude those addresses from the list as well. Thanks.
Addendum: that list is useful for occasionally catching and following up on email that shouldn't have been deleted. Logging those phony addresses interferes with that function.